From 19c7de16fddbe0f37eadfb05c64dd24412757ee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Hills Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:15:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] dsnoop: The stop threshold was not implemented correctly The previous implementation would mean that stop_threshold behaved erratically. The intent is to detect that the buffer is too full, and stop. In practice, I don't think this was a bug in practice for applications which don't adjust the stop_threshold. The line above catches those cases. Signed-off-by: Mark Hills Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c b/src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c index c64df381..790d944c 100644 --- a/src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c +++ b/src/pcm/pcm_dsnoop.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_dsnoop_sync_ptr(snd_pcm_t *pcm) // printf("sync ptr diff = %li\n", diff); if (pcm->stop_threshold >= pcm->boundary) /* don't care */ return 0; - if ((avail = snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm)) >= pcm->stop_threshold) { + if ((avail = snd_pcm_mmap_capture_avail(pcm)) >= pcm->stop_threshold) { gettimestamp(&dsnoop->trigger_tstamp, pcm->tstamp_type); dsnoop->state = SND_PCM_STATE_XRUN; dsnoop->avail_max = avail; -- 2.47.1